Redcar is cool, but I still can’t use Linux
With the arrival of Redcar, which is a TextMate-inspired “text-editor/IDE for Gnome in pure-Ruby”, Linux is becoming more appealing as an everyday OS. Honestly, I am almost ready to install Ubuntu in a VM just so I can try this out…
As cool as Redcar is, there isn’t one, or even a collection of applications that would make me switch to Linux. Let me put it this way, even if every application I use on OS X worked on Linux, I still couldn’t use Linux as my everyday, desktop OS. Why? Because OS X is the only OS that distinguishes between GUI editing and line editing.
Let’s start with a little background. The Mac was a GUI-based OS from the start, i.e., there was no command line. And because of this Apple, for whatever reason, created a new key on the keyboard: the Apple key (which is still in use today, but the Apple logo has been removed, and everyone refers to it as the “Command key”). There are two Apple/Command keys: one to the immediate left of the spacebar and one to the immediate right of the spacebar. (For some reason, I have never used the one to the right of the spacebar.)
So, what’s the Apple/Command key for? Well, it’s the equivalent of the Control key in Windows and Linux (but only for GUI editing in Linux, and now you can probably see where I am going with this…). If you want to “Select All” in a GUI Mac program, you use “Command A”, whereas in Windows and Linux, you would use “Control A”. Ok, so, great, what’s the difference? Well, what happens when I am writing an email and I want to go to the beginning of the line? Anyone? Anyone? … The suspense is killing me… On the Mac I would type “Control A”! How do I go to the beginning of the line in a GUI app on Linux? Please, you tell me. Oh, right, that special key, which is way out of my way, that had to be invented to do this simple task.
Now, let’s pull out the command line. How do I go to the beginning of the line? “Control A” of course (thank you emacs!). So, on Linux, if I am writing an email in Thunderbird and I want to select all, I hit “Control A”, but on the command line, “Control A” takes me to the beginning of the line… Excuse me? On OS X (and yes, this is with OS X, as (I believe) the only use for Control prior to OS X was the contextual menu support in OS 9), the Command key commands work in every app, and the Control key line editing commands work in every app.
Even in iPhoto, if I am editing the Title of a picture, I can use “Control A” to take me to the beginning of the line, and “Command A” to select all. Same is true for the Terminal (the command line) where I can use “Command F” to open the find dialog box (like on every other GUI app!) and search for something. And yes, “Command A” in the Terminal selects everything in the buffer, and then I can “Command C” to copy, switch over to another program, and “Command V” to paste.
As clean and amazing as this is, the pièce de résistance of this is that the command line “cut” — “Control K” — and “paste” — “Control Y” — both work in GUI apps, too, and uses a separate clipboard than the GUI cut and copy! So, this effectively gives me two clipboards! But, actually, it gives me n clipboards because the command line cut and paste are for that application only, whereas the the GUI cut, copy, and paste are global. So, this means I can use “Control K” in TextMate, and “Control K” in the Terminal, and when I do a “Control Y” in either of those apps, that app remembers the thing that I last “cut” in that application. This takes advantage of the fact that in OS X there are literally n clip/pasteboards.
Some Linux users have pointed out that you can switch to command line-like editing on a per-app basis — the concept is “enabling emacs key bindings” — but when you do this on Linux, you now have to use another key for doing GUI things like “select all”. So, to me, this is not a solution, in fact, it makes things worse because now you have to remember which apps have emacs key bindings enabled, and which don’t.
In closing, until Linux, or more precisely Gnome, KDE, or any other desktop environment makes a clear distinction between GUI editing and line editing, and it is implemented across all of the applications I would want to use every day, there is no way I can switch to Linux. Emacs line editing commands* are embedded in my brain, so are GUI editing commands, and it is a massive (which is an understatement) productivity killer to have them be inconsistent or just outright broken in Linux. And forget about Windows. I used Windows at work for 4 months and thought I was going to go nuts. I switched to Linux and got maybe another 4 months before I told my manager that I either get a Mac, or I’m leaving. (They gave me the Mac.)
* The GUI line editing in OS X is only a subset of the things you can do with emacs/command line. For instance, you can’t do “meta f” to skip ahead one word in the GUI, but for that, you have the “Option right arrow key”, which is universal in all GUI apps on OS X. The same goes for all word, line and page skipping, forward/back/up/down in GUI apps.
The Debate is Over
Tech people, well, let’s face it, geeks (and I include my self as a geek) sure do get fixated on things they feel are incorrect, and love to debate about them until they pass out. And for years, one of the biggest fixations and debates has centered around the price difference between a Mac and a Windows-based PC.
Prior to the Mac running on Intel, the argument was largely baseless because the systems ran different OSes. It really was like comparing apples and lemons (pun intended). But now that the Mac runs on the “x86″ architecture, the argument is even more baseless. In fact, there is no longer an argument. And this post is my attempt to convey why “The Debate is Over.”
Now that the Mac runs on the “x86″ architecture, there is no more need to debate the price of a Mac vs. the price of an IBM, or Acer, or Dell, etc., etc. Why? Because they are not in the same league! First, the Mac can run 99.9% of everything that can run on the IBM, Acer, etc. (with the exception of peripherals that require a connection — like RS232 — that the Mac does not have). Of course, the Mac can run one very important thing that these machines can’t: OS X. Not to mention the all of the thousands of applications that run only on OS X, like TextMate, OmniGraffle, etc.
However, that is not my argument, actually. The fact that the Mac can run more than these other systems, and even run Windows better than these systems (VMWare Fusion running with the Mac’s superior “sleep” technology puts PCs to shame) is not the point. It’s not the point because it doesn’t have to be.
So, what is the point then? The point is that they are the same, and yet different at the same time. Back when the Mac was run by the PowerPC, you really couldn’t make the argument that the Mac was like a Porsche and a Dell was like a Chevy because they didn’t run on the same roads, i.e., the Mac ran OS X and the PC ran Windows, etc. But now that the all of these computers run on the same architecture (this is the same part), this sameness is what makes them different. You see, the Mac really is a Porsche, now: it not only runs on the same roads, it runs on the same roads faster, and with a lot more style.
Basically, you have a choice now: If you want a cheap computer, buy an Acer. Who cares. Just buy it and be happy with it. You want a computer that was actually designed by someone who cares about design? Then buy a Mac. (The sharpness of the MacBook edge not withstanding. But hey, every company gets things wrong every now and then.)
The Mac is not about status to me. It is about design. I care about design. I choose to buy products that were developed by people who have as much, if not more, passion about design than I do. Hey, I could go out an buy a really ugly, cheap La-Z-Boy chair, but I’m not going to do it, because I care about how my place looks. I could buy a cheap, white, ugly refrigerator for my kitchen, but I’m not going to do it because I would then have to look at it every day.
See, the simple fact is, there are people out there who care about design, and there are people who don’t. The really great thing is, when it comes to computers, people who care about design actually have a choice now! The people who care about design, and yet have to run Windows for whatever reason, can now buy a Mac! They can run Windows natively, or run it under something like VMWare Fusion (which I highly recommend).
So, there really is no debate anymore: You want a cheap computer that was put together by a bunch of geeks with no sense of style and who’s product philosophy is, “People just want a cheap computer”, then buy a Dell. If you want a computer that was designed by people who actually know what “modern industrial design” is all about, then buy a Mac.
And to the Mac fan-boys out there: Stop defending Apple by talking about iLife, etc., etc. It doesn’t matter! Apple is now taken seriously by business, so there is no need to worry about being marginalized by a decreasing market share. It just isn’t happening anymore. The Mac is not going away just like Porsches are not going away. Use your Mac, and enjoy it. And if the geeks want to continue debating prices, let them do it. It’s meaningless chatter now anyway.
Sponsors
